Talk:Judgment Day
From Terminator Wiki
Contents |
July 25th
That's an interesting date for Judgment Day. It's my birthday. -Sec_1971 05:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, that was the date of J-Day in T3. The T-850 and the T-X arrived on July 24 and then the mayhem began. Though McG may be changing it in T5 to 2011 from what he's been saying in interviews. - Nx1701g 06:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- July 24th is Summer Glau's birthday, the 28th is mine. Spooky! -Grimace427 16:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
If McG really changes it to 2011 (which I hope), it may imply TS series is in a whole new timeline without T3 just like TSCC. --TX55TALK 13:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
TSCC
Why is this section marked out, even though it is an alternate timeline we should still have it either way.--T-888
- Great point! I removed the strike tags... the section clearly states that it's from an alternate reality. --Kanamekun 14:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, thanks for that man. --T-888
Cities
Can someone explain me the deal with the cities... why put them on if we don't have a cite? Ascaaear 04:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- I am pretty skeptical myself - I added the cite tag. But I tend to give articles a few days to settle down... if the citation isn't added by then, then we can cut the entire section. --Kanamekun 04:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Dates
I've noticed that some years are wiki-linked here and on other entries - like 1995. Some of these pages are condensed versions of the Timeline page. What do you think about wiki-linking years to specific sub-sections within the Timeline page? So for example, 1995 could link to here (the link doesn't work, but hopefully you get the idea): [1]
Whatcha think? --Kanamekun 05:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Having both the timeline and separate year pages wouldn't hurt. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Another thing, the same date and events are shown in several the timeline article, so I thought about we can use the first time the date occur in the timeline article? What you think?
- Comment to Riffsyphon: We cant use both places as we only can link to one article. Ascaaear 06:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey guys! Hmm, I'm not sure exactly how it would work. Now that I think about it, one problem is that the same year could appear in multiple timelines. I am going to have to brush up on my temporal mechanics haha! --Kanamekun 09:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, we could use the date, and link to the first occurance of the date (not the year), or what? Ascaaear 14:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
